4.2 Article

Tinnitus Impacts on Speech and Non-speech Stimuli

Journal

OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 10, Pages E921-E928

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002002

Keywords

Auditory brainstem response; Click; Plasticity; Speech; Subcortical; Tinnitus

Funding

  1. Iran University of Medical Sciences [93D.3303.320]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate how tinnitus affects the processing of speech and non-speech stimuli at the subcortical level. Study Design: Cross-sectional analytical study. Setting: Academic, tertiary referral center. Patients: Eighteen individuals with tinnitus and 20 controls without tinnitus matched based on their age and sex. All subjects had normal hearing sensitivity. Intervention: Diagnostic. Main Outcome Measures: The effect of tinnitus on the parameters of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) to non-speech (click-ABR), and speech (sABR) stimuli was investigated. Results: Latencies of click ABR in waves III, V, and Vn, as well as inter-peak latency (IPL) of I to V were significantly longer in individuals with tinnitus compared with the controls. Individuals with tinnitus demonstrated significantly longer latencies of all sABR waves than the control group. The tinnitus patients also exhibited a significant decrease in the slope of the V-A complex and reduced encoding of the first and higher formants. A significant difference was observed between the two groups in the spectral magnitudes, the first formant frequency range (F1) and a higher frequency region (HF). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that maladaptive neural plasticity resulting from tinnitus can be subcortically measured and affects timing processing of both speech and non-speech stimuli. The findings have been discussed based on models of maladaptive plasticity and the interference of tinnitus as an internal noise in synthesizing speech auditory stimuli.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available