4.5 Article

Prediction of incident vertebral fracture using CT-based finite element analysis

Journal

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 323-331

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4716-1

Keywords

Bone strength; Finite element analysis; Fracture prediction; Incident vertebral fracture

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AR053986, R00 AG042458, R01 AG041658, R01 AR041398]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Framingham Heart Study (NIH/NHLBI) [N01-HC-25195]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A Summary Prior studies show vertebral strength from computed tomography-based finite element analysis may be associated with vertebral fracture risk. We found vertebral strength had a strong association with new vertebral fractures, suggesting that vertebral strength measures identify those at risk for vertebral fracture and may be a useful clinical tool. Introduction We aimed to determine the association between vertebral strength by quantitative computed tomography (CT)-based finite element analysis (FEA) and incident vertebral fracture (VF). In addition, we examined sensitivity and specificity of previously proposed diagnostic thresholds for fragile bone strength and low BMD in predicting VF. Methods In a case-control study, 26 incident VF cases (13 men, 13 women) and 62 age- and sex-matched controls aged 50 to 85years were selected from the Framingham multi-detector computed tomography cohort. Vertebral compressive strength, integral vBMD, trabecular vBMD, CT-based BMC, and CT-based aBMD were measured from CT scans of the lumbar spine. Results Lower vertebral strength at baseline was associated with an increased risk of new or worsening VF after adjusting for age, BMI, and prevalent VF status (odds ratio (OR)=5.2 per 1 SD decrease, 95% CI 1.3-19.8). Area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve comparisons revealed that vertebral strength better predicted incident VF than CT-based aBMD (AUC=0.804 vs. 0.715, p=0.05) but was not better than integral vBMD (AUC=0.815) or CT-based BMC (AUC=0.794). Additionally, proposed fragile bone strength thresholds trended toward better sensitivity for identifying VF than that of aBMD-classified osteoporosis (0.46 vs. 0.23, p=0.09). Conclusion This study shows an association between vertebral strength measures and incident vertebral fracture in men and women. Though limited by a small sample size, our findings also suggest that bone strength estimates by CT-based FEA provide equivalent or better ability to predict incident vertebral fracture compared to CT-based aBMD. Our study confirms that CT-based estimates of vertebral strength from FEA are useful for identifying patients who are at high risk for vertebral fracture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available