4.6 Article

Thermal behavior in the cracking reaction zone of scramjet cooling channels at different channel aspect ratios

Journal

ACTA ASTRONAUTICA
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages 41-56

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.05.015

Keywords

Scramjet engine; Regenerative cooling; Thermal behavior; 3-D; Channel aspect ratio; Cracking reaction

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [51476044, 51276047]
  2. Shenzhen Technology Project [JCYJ20150529115038093]
  3. Innovative Research Groups of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51421063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To study the thermal behavior in the cracking reaction zone of regeneratively cooled scramjet cooling channels at different aspect ratios, 3-D model of fuel flow in terms of the fuel's real properties and cracking reaction is built and validated through experiments. The whole cooling channel is divided into non-cracking and cracking reaction zones. Only the cracking reaction zone is studied in this article. The simulation results indicate that the fuel conversion presents a similar distribution with temperature because the fuel conversion in scramjet cooling channels is co-decided by the temperature and velocity but the temperature plays the dominate role. For the cases given in this paper, increasing the channel aspect ratio Will increase the pressure drop and it is not beneficial for reducing the wall temperature because of the much severer thermal stratification, larger conversion non-uniformity, the corresponding M-shape velocity profile which will cause local heat transfer deterioration and the decreased chemical heat absorption. And the decreased chemical heat absorption caused by stronger temperature and conversion non-uniformities is bad for the utilization of chemical heat sink, chemical recuperation process and the ignition performance. (C) 2016 IAA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available