4.6 Article

Performance of mode diversity reception of a polarization-division-multiplexed signal for free-space optical communication under atmospheric turbulence

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 26, Issue 22, Pages 28263-28276

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.26.028263

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Japan [1860101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the performance of mode diversity reception of a polarization-division-multiplexed (PDM) signal with few-mode-fiber (FMF) coupling for high-speed free-space optical communications under atmospheric turbulence. Optical propagation through eigenmodes of a FMF yields coupling between different linearly polarized (LP) modes in orthogonal polarizations, which causes power imbalance and loss of the orthogonality of multiplexed signals within each individual LP mode. Due to this phenomenon, the architecture of mode diversity combining affects the receiver performance. We numerically simulated the power fluctuation coupled to each LP mode after atmospheric propagation and FMF propagation in the condition of an optical downlink from a low-Earth-orbital satellite to the ground. We found that full receiver-side multiple-input multiple-output (Rx-MIMO) architecture in three-mode diversity reception improved the performance by 5 dB compared with selection combining (SC) of signals decoded individually in LP modes, and that it mitigated the required transmitted power by 6 dB compared with reception with single mode fiber (SMF) coupling. We also experimentally confirmed in three-mode diversity reception of a 128 Gb/s PDM-quadrature phase-shift keying with a diffuser plate as a turbulence emulator, that full Rx-MIMO with adaptive filters could work under severe fading and that it outperformed SC. (C) 2018 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available