4.7 Article

A method for determining the allocation strategy of on-shore power supply from a green container terminal perspective

Journal

OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages 158-175

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.007

Keywords

Green port; Container terminal; On-shore power supply; Carbon emissions

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51709037, 51779037]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT18RC(4)053]
  3. Doctoral Research Initial Funding in Dalian University of Technology [20170520165]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main contribution of this paper is to determine the allocation strategy of on-shore power supply (OPS) comprising additional power capacity of OPS and adopting patterns of OPS at berth, to realize the trade-off between total cost of OPS and carbon emissions of ships. Firstly, carbon emission formulations, adopting patterns of OPS and arrival patterns of ships are described. Then, in order to minimize total cost and carbon emissions, and integer programming model for OPS allocation problem is proposed. Next, a simulation-based solution method in developed to resolve the optimization model, which consists of inner simulation module and outer optimization module. The outer module enumerates all the allocation scenarios and evaluates the results from the inner module. The inner module introduces a simulation model to represent the stochastic operation system in the container terminal and outputs results to outer module. Finally, taking a port in China as an example, this paper designs and conducts a series of experiments and discovers that the sensitivity of results emphasizes the importance of electricity price on the optimal allocation. When electricity price is lower or larger than 0.3 $/kWh, the optimal power capacity is 9200 or 5230 kW, correspondingly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available