4.7 Article

Examining Endocrine Disruptors Measured in Newborn Dried Blood Spots and Early Childhood Growth in a Prospective Cohort

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 145-151

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.22332

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [HHSN275201200005C, HHSN267200700019C]
  2. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [ZIAHD008826] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The goal of this study was to determine whether newborn concentrations of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), and bisphenol A (BPA) are associated with early childhood growth. Methods A total of 1,954 singletons and 966 twins from the Upstate KIDS Study (born 2008-2010) were included in this study. Newborn dried blood spot concentrations of PFOS, PFOA, and BPA were quantified by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Children's weight and height were reported from birth through 3 years of age. Repeated measures were modeled using generalized linear mixed models. Results PFOS and PFOA were associated with lower BMI (-0.078 kg/m(2) [-0.12 to -0.038] and -0.076 kg/m(2) [-0.17 to -0.051] per 1 standard deviation increase in log PFOS and PFOA, respectively) and not with early obesity among singletons. Inconsistent associations were observed for twins. BPA levels were higher among neonates with a neonatal intensive care unit stay (P < 0.001), making associations difficult to interpret. Conclusions Perfluorinated alkyl substances did not exhibit obesogenic associations with early measures of childhood growth. Blood-based BPA measures are limited by the nonpersistent nature of the chemical, and unknown sources from hospital settings may present only transient exposures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available