4.8 Article

InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue D1, Pages D351-D360

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1100

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [108433/Z/15/Z]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/N00521X/1, BB/N019172/1, BB/L024136/1]
  3. National Science Foundation, Division of Biological Infrastructure [1458808]
  4. Intramural Research Program of the National Library of Medicine at National Institutes of Health/DHHS
  5. ELIXIR, the research infrastructure for life-science data
  6. European Molecular Biology Laboratory core funds
  7. Research Councils UK (RCUK)
  8. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [1458808] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Wellcome Trust [108433/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  11. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE [ZIHLM200888] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  12. BBSRC [BB/N00521X/1, BB/L024136/1, BB/R014892/1, BB/N019172/1, BB/N019431/2, BB/K020013/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. MRC [MC_UP_1201/14] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The InterPro database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/) classifies protein sequences into families and predicts the presence of functionally important domains and sites. Here, we report recent developments with InterPro (version 70.0) and its associated software, including an 18% growth in the size of the database in terms on new InterPro entries, updates to content, the inclusion of an additional entry type, refined modelling of discontinuous domains, and the development of a new programmatic interface and website. These developments extend and enrich the information provided by InterPro, and provide greater flexibility in terms of data access. We also show that InterPro's sequence coverage has kept pace with the growth of UniProtKB, and discuss how our evaluation of residue coverage may help guide future curation activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available