4.8 Article

The Pfam protein families database in 2019

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue D1, Pages D427-D432

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky995

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [654039]
  2. Wellcome Trust [108433/Z/15/Z]
  3. Biotechnology and Biosciences Research Council [BB/L024136/1]
  4. European Molecular Biology Laboratory core funds
  5. European Cooperation in Science and Technology COST Action [BM1405 NGP-net]
  6. National Human Genome Research Institute of the US National Institutes of Health [R01-HG009116]
  7. Research Councils UK (RCUK)
  8. Wellcome Trust [108433/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The last few years have witnessed significant changes in Pfam (https://pfam.xfam.org). The number of families has grown substantially to a total of 17,929 in release 32.0. New additions have been coupled with efforts to improve existing families, including refinement of domain boundaries, their classification into Pfam clans, as well as their functional annotation. We recently began to collaborate with the RepeatsDB resource to improve the definition of tandem repeat families within Pfam. We carried out a significant comparison to the structural classification database, namely the Evolutionary Classification of Protein Domains (ECOD) that led to the creation of 825 new families based on their set of uncharacterized families(EUFs). Furthermore, we also connected Pfam entries to the Sequence Ontology (SO) through mapping of the Pfam type definitions to SO terms. Since Pfam has many community contributors, we recently enabled the linking between authorship of all Pfam entries with the corresponding authors' ORCID identifiers. This effectively permits authors to claim credit for their Pfam curation and link them to their ORCID record.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available