4.8 Article

PreMedKB: an integrated precision medicine knowledgebase for interpreting relationships between diseases, genes, variants and drugs

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue D1, Pages D1090-D1101

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1042

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31720103909, 31471239, 31671368, 31601085]
  2. National Key R&D Project of China [2016YFC0901704, 2017YFC0907502, 2017YFC0907000, 2017YFF0204600]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2017SHZDZX01]
  4. 111 Project [B13016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One important aspect of precision medicine aims to deliver the right medicine to the right patient at the right dose at the right time based on the unique omics' features of each individual patient, thus maximizing drug efficacy and minimizing adverse drug reactions. However, fragmentation and heterogeneity of available data makes it challenging to readily obtain first-hand information regarding some particular diseases, drugs, genes and variants of interest. Therefore, we developed the Precision Medicine Knowledgebase (PreMedKB) by seamlessly integrating the four fundamental components of precision medicine: diseases, genes, variants and drugs. PreMedKB allows for search of comprehensive information within each of the four components, the relationships between any two or more components, and importantly, the interpretation of the clinical meanings of a patient's genetic variants. PreMedKB is an efficient and user-friendly tool to assist researchers, clinicians or patients in interpreting a patient's genetic profile in terms of discovering potential pathogenic variants, recommending therapeutic regimens, designing panels for genetic testing kits, and matching patients for clinical trials. PreMedKB is freely accessible and available at http://www.fudan-pgx.org/premedkb/index.html#/home.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available