4.6 Article

Imaging microstructure of the barley rhizosphere: particle packing and root hair influences

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 221, Issue 4, Pages 1878-1889

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15516

Keywords

Hordeum vulgare; noninvasive imaging; particle packing; rhizosphere; root hairs; soil structure; synchrotron

Categories

Funding

  1. BBSRC SARISA [BB/L025620/1, BB/P004180/1]
  2. ERC [646809DIMR]
  3. BBSRC [BB/L025825/1, BB/J00868/1]
  4. Rural & Environment Science & Analytical Services Division of the Scottish Government
  5. EPSRC [EP/M020355/1]
  6. NERC [NE/L00237/1]
  7. BBSRC [BB/L025825/1, BB/L026058/1, BB/P004180/1, BB/L025620/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil adjacent to roots has distinct structural and physical properties from bulk soil, affecting water and solute acquisition by plants. Detailed knowledge on how root activity and traits such as root hairs affect the three-dimensional pore structure at a fine scale is scarce and often contradictory. Roots of hairless barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv Optic) mutant (NRH) and its wildtype (WT) parent were grown in tubes of sieved (<250 mu m) sandy loam soil under two different water regimes. The tubes were scanned by synchrotron-based X-ray computed tomography to visualise pore structure at the soil-root interface. Pore volume fraction and pore size distribution were analysed vs distance within 1 mm of the root surface. Less dense packing of particles at the root surface was hypothesised to cause the observed increased pore volume fraction immediately next to the epidermis. The pore size distribution was narrower due to a decreased fraction of larger pores. There were no statistically significant differences in pore structure between genotypes or moisture conditions. A model is proposed that describes the variation in porosity near roots taking into account soil compaction and the surface effect at the root surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available