4.8 Article

Alirocumab and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 379, Issue 22, Pages 2097-2107

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801174

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sanofi
  2. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  3. Cerenis
  4. Resverlogix
  5. Roche
  6. Medicines Company
  7. Bayer
  8. Merck
  9. Amarin
  10. Servier
  11. Baxter
  12. AstraZeneca
  13. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  14. Eisai
  15. Ethicon
  16. Medtronic
  17. Sanofi Aventis
  18. Pfizer
  19. Forest Laboratories-AstraZeneca
  20. Ischemix
  21. Amgen
  22. Lilly
  23. Chiesi
  24. Iron-wood
  25. Abbott
  26. Regeneron
  27. PhaseBio
  28. Idorsia
  29. Synaptic
  30. DalCor
  31. TIMI Group
  32. CSL
  33. Apple
  34. Portola
  35. Janssen
  36. Novartis
  37. Johnson Johnson
  38. Afferent
  39. Cardiva Medical
  40. Daiichi
  41. Ferring
  42. Google
  43. Luitpold
  44. Tenax
  45. Ferring Pharmaceuticals
  46. Myokardia
  47. Omthera Pharmaceuticals
  48. Pfizer New Zealand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Patients who have had an acute coronary syndrome are at high risk for recurrent ischemic cardiovascular events. We sought to determine whether alirocumab, a human monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9), would improve cardiovascular outcomes after an acute coronary syndrome in patients receiving high-intensity statin therapy. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 18,924 patients who had an acute coronary syndrome 1 to 12 months earlier, had a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level of at least 70 mg per deciliter (1.8 mmol per liter), a non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of at least 100 mg per deciliter (2.6 mmol per liter), or an apolipoprotein B level of at least 80 mg per deciliter, and were receiving statin therapy at a high-intensity dose or at the maximum tolerated dose. Patients were randomly assigned to receive alirocumab subcutaneously at a dose of 75 mg (9462 patients) or matching placebo (9462 patients) every 2 weeks. The dose of alirocumab was adjusted under blinded conditions to target an LDL cholesterol level of 25 to 50 mg per deciliter (0.6 to 1.3 mmol per liter). The primary end point was a composite of death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. RESULTS The median duration of follow-up was 2.8 years. A composite primary end-point event occurred in 903 patients (9.5%) in the alirocumab group and in 1052 patients (11.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.93; P<0.001). A total of 334 patients (3.5%) in the alirocumab group and 392 patients (4.1%) in the placebo group died (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98). The absolute benefit of alirocumab with respect to the composite primary end point was greater among patients who had a baseline LDL cholesterol level of 100 mg or more per deciliter than among patients who had a lower baseline level. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups, with the exception of local injection-site reactions (3.8% in the alirocumab group vs. 2.1% in the placebo group). CONCLUSIONS Among patients who had a previous acute coronary syndrome and who were receiving high-intensity statin therapy, the risk of recurrent ischemic cardiovascular events was lower among those who received alirocumab than among those who received placebo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available