4.8 Article

Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells Become Regionally Diverse and Heterogeneous with Age

Journal

NEURON
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages 459-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.12.020

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program [771411]
  2. Wellcome Trust [091543/Z/10/Z, 102160/Z/13/Z]
  3. Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group Allen Distinguished Investigator Award [12076]
  4. Medical Research Council studentship
  5. Gates Cambridge Trust Gates scholarship
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council studentship
  7. Homerton College Cambridge junior research fellowship
  8. UK MS Society Cambridge Myelin Repair Centre grant [50]
  9. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec - Sante scholarship
  10. Cambridge Commonwealth, European and International Trust scholarship
  11. Lister Institute research prize
  12. Wellcome Trust [091543/Z/10/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  13. European Research Council (ERC) [771411] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  14. MRC [G0701476, MC_PC_15042] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs), which differentiate into myelinating oligodendrocytes during CNS development, are the main proliferative cells in the adult brain. OPCs are conventionally considered a homogeneous population, particularly with respect to their electrophysiological properties, but this has been debated. We show, by using single-cell electrophysiological recordings, that OPCs start out as a homogeneous population but become functionally heterogeneous, varying both within and between brain regions and with age. These electrophysiological changes in OPCs correlate with the differentiation potential of OPCs; thus, they may underlie the differentiational differences in OPCs between regions and, likewise, differentiation failure with age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available