4.6 Review

Viral and other therapies for recurrent glioblastoma: is a 24-month durable response unusual?

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 14-25

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy170

Keywords

virotherapy; oncolytic virus; clinical trials; review; GBM

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [2P01CA163205, CA069246-20, P50CA165962]
  2. Amgen, Inc.
  3. NIH [K08NS101091]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A phase I trial of an engineered poliovirus for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) has attracted attention due to 8 survivors reaching the 24-month and 5 reaching the 36-month survival landmarks.(1) Genetically engineered viruses (oncolytic viruses) have been in trials for GBM for almost two decades.(2) These replication-competent (tumor-selective, oncolytic, replication-conditional) viruses or replication-defective viral vectors (gene therapy) deliver cytotoxic payloads to tumors, leading to immunogenic death and intratumoral inflammatory responses. This transforms the tumor microenvironment from immunologically naive (cold) to inflamed (hot), increasing immune cell recognition of tumor antigens and the durable responses observed in virotherapy.(3,4) Several current and past virotherapy trials have reported a tail of apparent responders at the 24-month landmark. Other modalities have also reported a tail of seemingly long-term survivors. These trials seem to show that these responder tails characterize a defined subset of GBM patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available