4.8 Article

Tuning the Lattice Parameter of InxZnyP for Highly Luminescent Lattice-Matched Core/Shell Quantum Dots

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 4754-4762

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b01266

Keywords

quantum dots; core/shell heterostructures; In(Zn)P; lattice mismatch; alloy nanocrystals; phosphors

Funding

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation STW, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. Ministry of Economic Affairs
  3. European Community (ERC) [614897, 240299]
  4. ERC [648433(ICONICAL)]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [614897, 240299] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colloidal quantum dots (QDs) show great promise as LED phosphors due to their tunable narrow-band emission and ability to produce high-quality white light. Currently, the most suitable QDs for lighting applications are based on cadmium, which presents a toxicity problem for consumer applications. The most promising cadmium-free candidate QDs are based on InP, but their quality lags much behind that of cadmium based QDs. This is not only because the synthesis of InP QDs is more challenging than that of Cd-based QDs, but also because the large lattice parameter of InP makes it difficult to grow an epitaxial, defect-free shell on top of such material. Here, we propose a viable approach to overcome this problem by alloying InP nanocrystals with Zn2+ ions, which enables the synthesis of InxZnyP alloy QDs having lattice constant that can be tuned from 5.93 angstrom (pure InP QDs) down to 5.39 angstrom by simply varying the concentration of the Zn precursor. This lattice engineering allows for subsequent strain-free, epitaxial growth of a ZnSezS1-z shell with lattice parameters matching that of the core. We demonstrate, for a wide range of core and shell compositions (i.e., varying x, y, and z), that the photoluminescence quantum yield is maximal (up to 60%) when lattice mismatch is minimal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available