4.5 Review

Community profiling of the urinary microbiota: considerations for low-biomass samples

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 735-749

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41585-018-0104-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Oregon BIRCWH (Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health) programme (US NIH) [K12HD043488]
  2. NIH [UL1TR002369, U24TR002306, K01DK116706, R01EY029266, P01DK46763, P30CA016042, UL1TR001881, R01MH115357, R01MH105538, R01MH096773, R00MH091238]
  3. Rheumatology Research Foundation
  4. Spondylitis Association of America
  5. Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB)
  6. Stan and Madelle Rosenfeld Family Trust
  7. William and Mary Bauman Family Foundation
  8. Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction (Overactive Bladder Syndrome Urgency Urinary Incontinence grant)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many studies have shown that the urinary tract harbours its own microbial community known as the urinary microbiota, which have been implicated in urinary tract disorders. This observation contradicts the long-held notion that urine is a sterile biofluid in the absence of acute infection of the urinary tract. In light of this new discovery, many basic questions that are crucial for understanding the role of the urinary microbiota in human health and disease remain unanswered. Given that the urinary microbiota is an emerging area of study, optimized techniques and protocols to identify microorganisms in the urinary tract are still being established. However, the low microbial biomass and close proximity to higher microbial biomass environments (for example, the vagina) present distinct methodological challenges for microbial community profiling of the urinary microbiota. A clear understanding of the unique technical considerations for obtaining and analysing low microbial biomass samples, as well the influence of key elements of experimental design and computational analysis on downstream interpretation, will improve our ability to interpret and compare results across methods and studies and is relevant for studies profiling the urinary microbiota and other sites of low microbial abundance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available