4.6 Article

Accelerating anticancer drug development - opportunities and trade-offs

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 777-786

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41571-018-0102-3

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  2. NIH/National Cancer Institute
  3. American Association for Cancer Research
  4. American Cancer Society
  5. American College of Radiology
  6. ASCO
  7. American Society of Hematology
  8. Association of American Cancer Institutes
  9. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  10. Cancer Support Community
  11. CEO Roundtable on Cancer
  12. Flatiron Health
  13. Helsinn Therapeutics (US)
  14. LIVESTRONG Foundation
  15. Merck
  16. National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  17. Novartis Oncology
  18. Oncology Nursing Society
  19. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The traditional approach to drug development in oncology, with discrete phases of clinical testing, is becoming untenable owing to expansion of the precision medicine paradigm, whereby patients are stratified into multiple subgroups according to the underlying cancer biology. Seamless approaches to drug development in oncology hold great promise of accelerating the accessibility of novel therapeutic agents to the public but are also accompanied by important trade-offs, including the limited availability of information on the clinical benefit and safety of novel agents at the time of market entry. In this Perspectives article, we describe several opportunities, in the form of novel trial designs or modelling strategies, to improve the efficiency of drug development in oncology, as well as new mechanisms to obtain information about anticancer therapies throughout their life cycle, such as innovative functional imaging techniques or the use of real-world clinical data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available