4.7 Article

Mitigating head motion artifact in functional connectivity MRI

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 2801-2826

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0065-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01MH107703, R01MH112847, R21MH106799, R01EB022573, R01MH101111]
  2. Lifespan Brain Institute at Penn/CHOP
  3. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  5. Army Research Laboratory [W911NF1020022]
  6. Army Research Office [W911NF1410679, W911NF1610474]
  7. National Institute of Health [R01DC00920911, R01HD086888, R01MH107235, R01MH109520, R01NS099348]
  8. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [W911NF1610474] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Participant motion during functional magnetic resonance image (fMRI) acquisition produces spurious signal fluctuations that can confound measures of functional connectivity. Without mitigation, motion artifact can bias statistical inferences about relationships between connectivity and individual differences. To counteract motion artifact, this protocol describes the implementation of a validated, high-performance denoising strategy that combines a set of model features, including physiological signals, motion estimates, and mathematical expansions, to target both widespread and focal effects of subject movement. This protocol can be used to reduce motion-related variance to near zero in studies of functional connectivity, providing up to a 100-fold improvement over minimal-processing approaches in large datasets. Image denoising requires 40 min to 4 h of computing per image, depending on model specifications and data dimensionality. The protocol additionally includes instructions for assessing the performance of a denoising strategy. Associated software implements all denoising and diagnostic procedures, using a combination of established image-processing libraries and the eXtensible Connectivity Pipeline (XCP) software.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available