4.8 Article

Microencapsulated Phase Change Materials in Solar-Thermal Conversion Systems: Understanding Geometry-Dependent Heating Efficiency and System Reliability

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 721-729

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b07126

Keywords

microencapsulation; emulsification; phase change materials; nanocarbons; encapsulation ratio; solar-thermal conversion; PF-QNM

Funding

  1. ERC Consolidator Grants [ERC 647969]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N51004X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Biofilms Innovation Centre [NBIC Co-Director Raval] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/N51004X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of solar-thermal conversion systems can be improved by incorporation of nanocarbon-stabilized microencapsulated phase change materials (MPCMs). The geometry of MPCMs in the microcapsules plays an important role for improving their heating efficiency and reliability. Yet few efforts have been made to critically examine the formation mechanism of different geometries and their effect on MPCMs-shell interaction. Herein, through changing the cooling rate of original emulsions, we acquire MPCMs within the nanocarbon microcapsules with a hollow structure of MPCMs (h-MPCMs) or solid PCM core particles (s-MPCMs). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy reveals that the capsule shell of the h-MPCMs is enriched with nanocarbons and has a greater MPCMs-shell interaction compared to s-MPCMs. This results in the h-MPCMs being more stable and having greater heat diffusivity within and above the phase transition range than the s-MPCMs do. The geometry-dependent heating efficiency and system stability may have important and general implications for the fundamental understanding of microencapsulation and wider breadth of heating generating systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available