4.8 Article

Ultrasoft electronics to monitor dynamically pulsing cardiomyocytes

Journal

NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 156-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-018-0331-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [17H06149]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H06149] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In biointegrated electronics, the facile control of mechanical properties such as softness and stretchability in electronic devices is necessary to minimize the perturbation of motions inherent in biological systems(1-5). For in vitro studies, multielectrode-embedded dishes(6-8) and other rigid devices(9-12) have been widely used. Soft or flexible electronics on plastic or elastomeric substrates(13-15) offer promising new advantages such as decreasing physical stress(16-18) and/or applying mechanical stimuli(19,20). Recently, owing to the introduction of macroporous plastic substrates with nanofibre scaffolds(21,22), three-dimensional electrophysiological mapping of cardiomyocytes has been demonstrated. However, quantitatively monitoring cells that exhibit significant dynamical motions via electric probes over a long period without affecting their natural motion remains a challenge. Here, we present ultrasoft electronics with nanomeshes that monitor the field potential of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes on a hydrogel, while enabling them to move dynamically without interference. Owing to the extraordinary softness of the nanomeshes, nanomesh-attached cardiomyocytes exhibit contraction and relaxation motions comparable to that of cardiomyocytes without attached nanomeshes. Our multilayered nanomesh devices maintain reliable operations in a liquid environment, enabling the recording of field potentials of the cardiomyocytes over a period of 96 h without significant degradation of the nanomesh devices or damage of the cardiomyocytes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available