4.8 Article

In situ quantification of interphasial chemistry in Li-ion battery

Journal

NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 50-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-018-0284-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Materials Genome Project [2016YFB0700600]
  2. Guangdong Innovation Team Project [2013N080]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research Grants [JCYJ20151015162256516, JCYJ20150729111733470, JCYJ20160226105838578]
  4. US Department of Energy [DE-AC0206CH11357]
  5. Vehicle Technologies Office, Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
  6. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) is probably the least understood component in Li-ion batteries. Considerable effort has been put into understanding its formation and electrochemistry under realistic battery conditions, but mechanistic insights have mostly been inferred indirectly. Here we show the formation of the SEI between a graphite anode and a carbonate electrolyte through combined atomic-scale microscopy and in situ and operando techniques. In particular, we weigh the graphitic anode during its initial lithiation process with an electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance, which unequivocally identifies lithium fluoride and lithium alkylcarbonates as the main chemical components at different potentials. In situ gas analysis confirms the preferential reduction of cyclic over acyclic carbonate molecules, making its reduction product the major component in the SEI. We find that SEI formation starts at graphite edge sites with dimerization of solvated Li+ intercalation between graphite layers. We also show that this lithium salt, at least in its nascent form, can be re-oxidized, despite the general belief that an SEI is electrochemically inert and its formation irreversible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available