4.8 Article

Fingerprints of internal drivers of Arctic sea ice loss in observations and model simulations

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 28-+

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-018-0256-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NOAA's Climate Program Office, Climate Variability and Predictability Program [NA15OAR4310162]
  2. NSF's Polar Programs [OPP1744598, ARC1203425]
  3. CESM Large Ensemble Community Project
  4. Ocean Observing and Monitoring Division [NA18OAR4310424]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relative contribution and physical drivers of internal variability in recent Arctic sea ice loss remain open questions, leaving up for debate whether global climate models used for climate projection lack sufficient sensitivity in the Arctic to climate forcing. Here, through analysis of large ensembles of fully coupled climate model simulations with historical radiative forcing, we present an important internal mechanism arising from low-frequency Arctic atmospheric variability in models that can cause substantial summer sea ice melting in addition to that due to anthropogenic forcing. This simulated internal variability shows a strong similarity to the observed Arctic atmospheric change in the past 37 years. Through a fingerprint pattern matching method, we estimate that this internal variability contributes to about 40-50% of observed multi-decadal decline in Arctic sea ice. Our study also suggests that global climate models may not actually underestimate sea ice sensitivities in the Arctic, but have trouble fully replicating an observed linkage between the Arctic and lower latitudes in recent decades. Further improvements in simulating the observed Arctic-global linkage are thus necessary before the Arctic's sensitivity to global warming in models can be quantified with confidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available