4.8 Article

Identification of a cellularly active SIRT6 allosteric activator

Journal

NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages 1118-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-018-0150-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB910403]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81721004, 91753117, 81322046, 81302698, 31671459, U1605221, 2181001006]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars
  4. Innovative Research Team of the University of the Ministry Education of China
  5. CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team
  6. Innovation Program of the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
  7. State Key Laboratory of Luminescence and application [SKLA-2016-12]
  8. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 'Personalized Medicines-Molecular Signature-based Drug Discovery and Development' [XDA12040100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SIRT6, a member of the SIRT deacetylase family, is responsible for deacetylation of histone H3 N-epsilon-acetyl-lysines 9 (H3K9ac) and 56 (H3K56ac). As a tumor suppressor, SIRT6 has frequently been found to have low expression in various cancers. Here, we report the identification of MDL-800, a selective SIRT6 activator. MDL-800 increased the deacetylase activity of SIRT6 by up to 22-fold via binding to an allosteric site; this interaction led to a global decrease in H3K9ac and H3K56ac levels in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. Consequently, MDL-800 inhibited the proliferation of HCC cells via SIRT6-driven cell-cycle arrest and was effective in a tumor xenograft model. Together, these data demonstrate that pharmacological activation of SIRT6 is a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of HCC. MDL-800 is a first-in-class small-molecule cellular SIRT6 activator that can be used to physiologically and pathologically investigate the roles of SIRT6 deacetylation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available