4.8 Article

On-demand manufacturing of clinical-quality biopharmaceuticals

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 10, Pages 988-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4262

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) [N66001-13-C-4025]
  2. SPAWAR System Center Pacific (SSC Pacific) [N66001-13-C-4025]
  3. Koch Institute from the National Cancer Institute [P30-CA14051]
  4. Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  5. NIGMS/MIT Biotechnology Training Program Fellowship under NIH contract [2T32GM008334-26]
  6. Mazumdar Shaw International Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conventional manufacturing of protein biopharmaceuticals in centralized, large-scale, single-product facilities is not well-suited to the agile production of drugs for small patient populations or individuals. Previous solutions for small-scale manufacturing are limited in both process reproducibility and product quality, owing to their complicated means of protein expression and purification(1-4). We describe an automated, benchtop, multiproduct manufacturing system, called Integrated Scalable Cyto-Technology (InSCyT), for the end-to-end production of hundreds to thousands of doses of clinical-quality protein biologics in about 3 d. Unlike previous systems, InSCyT includes fully integrated modules for sustained production, efficient purification without the use of affinity tags, and formulation to a final dosage form of recombinant biopharmaceuticals. We demonstrate that InSCyT can accelerate process development from sequence to purified drug in 12 weeks. We used integrated design to produce human growth hormone, interferon alpha-2b and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with highly similar processes on this system and show that their purity and potency are comparable to those of marketed reference products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available