4.8 Article

Complex mammalian-like haematopoietic system found in a colonial chordate

Journal

NATURE
Volume 564, Issue 7736, Pages 425-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0783-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R56AI089968, R01AG037968, RO1GM100315, 5T32AI07290-28, T32 HL120824-03]
  2. Virginia and D. K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research
  3. Siebel Stem Cell Institute
  4. PRIN [2015NSFHXF]
  5. Human Frontier Science Program Organization [LT000591/2014-L]
  6. Stinehart-Reed grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Haematopoiesis is an essential process that evolved in multicellular animals. At the heart of this process are haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), which are multipotent and self-renewing, and generate the entire repertoire of blood and immune cells throughout an animal's life(1). Although there have been comprehensive studies on self-renewal, differentiation, physiological regulation and niche occupation in vertebrate HSCs, relatively little is known about the evolutionary origin and niches of these cells. Here we describe the haematopoietic system of Botryllus schlosseri, a colonial tunicate that has a vasculature and circulating blood cells, and interesting stem-cell biology and immunity characteristics(2-8). Self-recognition between genetically compatible B. schlosseri colonies leads to the formation of natural parabionts with shared circulation, whereas incompatible colonies reject each other(3,4,7). Using flow cytometry, whole-transcriptome sequencing of defined cell populations and diverse functional assays, we identify HSCs, progenitors, immune effector cells and an HSC niche, and demonstrate that self-recognition inhibits allospecific cytotoxic reactions. Our results show that HSC and myeloid lineage immune cells emerged in a common ancestor of tunicates and vertebrates, and also suggest that haematopoietic bone marrow and the B. schlosseri endostyle niche evolved from a common origin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available