4.8 Article

Opportunities and Limitations for Nanophotonic Structures To Exceed the Shockley-Queisser Limit

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages 8620-8631

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b03950

Keywords

nanophotonics; detailed balance; Shockley-Queisser; open-circuit voltage; photovoltaics; nanowires; efficiency

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. European Research Council under the European Union [337328]
  3. Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences (KNTAW)
  4. Air Force Office of Scientific Research
  5. Welch Foundation [F-1802]
  6. Simons Foundation
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [337328] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanophotonic engineering holds great promise for photovoltaics, with several recently proposed approaches that have enabled efficiencies close to the Shockley-Queisser limit. Here, we theoretically demonstrate that suitably designed nanophotonic structures may be able to surpass the 1 sun Shockley-Queisser limit by utilizing tailored directivity of the scattering response of nanoparticles. We show that large absorption cross sections do not play a significant role in the efficiency enhancement, and on the contrary, directivity enhancement constitutes the nanoscale equivalent to concentration in macroscopic photovoltaic systems. Based on this principle, we discuss fundamental limits to the efficiency based on directivity bounds and a number of approaches to get dose to these limits. We also highlight that, in practice, achieving efficiencies above the Shockley-Queisser limit is strongly hindered by whether high short-circuit currents can be maintained. Finally, we discuss how our results are affected by the presence of significant nonradiative recombination, in which case both directivity and photon escape probability should be increased to achieve voltage enhancement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available