4.8 Article

LILRB4 signalling in leukaemia cells mediates T cell suppression and tumour infiltration

Journal

NATURE
Volume 562, Issue 7728, Pages 605-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0615-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [1R01CA172268, 5P30CA142543]
  2. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society [1024-14, TRP-6024-14]
  3. March of Dimes Foundation [1-FY14-201]
  4. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP140402, DP150056, RP180435, PR150551, RR150072]
  5. Robert A. Welch Foundation [I-1834, AU-0042-20030616]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81570093, 81422001, 81721004]
  7. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB965000]
  8. China Scholarship Council [201608330307]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immune checkpoint blockade therapy has been successful in treating some types of cancer but has not shown clinical benefits for treating leukaemia(1). This result suggests that leukaemia uses unique mechanisms to evade this therapy. Certain immune inhibitory receptors that are expressed by normal immune cells are also present on leukaemia cells. Whether these receptors can initiate immune-related primary signalling in tumour cells remains unknown. Here we use mouse models and human cells to show that LILRB4, an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif-containing receptor and a marker of monocytic leukaemia, supports tumour cell infiltration into tissues and suppresses T cell activity via a signalling pathway that involves APOE, LILRB4, SHP-2, uPAR and ARG1 in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cells. Deletion of LILRB4 or the use of antibodies to block LILRB4 signalling impeded AML development. Thus, LILRB4 orchestrates tumour invasion pathways in monocytic leukaemia cells by creating an immunosuppressive microenvironment. LILRB4 represents a compelling target for the treatment of monocytic AML.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available