4.8 Review

Influence of molecular fluorophores on the research field of chemically synthesized carbon dots

Journal

NANO TODAY
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 124-139

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2018.10.010

Keywords

Carbon dots; Molecular fluorophores; Chemical synthesis; Optical properties; Luminescence; Aggregation

Funding

  1. NPRP from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of the Qatar Foundation) [8-878-1-172]
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [14.Y26.31.0028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon dots (CDs) - small crystalline or amorphous carbon-based nanoparticles - have attracted much attention as promising fluorescent materials for a wide range of applications. One of their widely accepted advantages is the simplicity of the formation of highly luminescent CDs from a wide variety of organic precursors. At the same time, several recent studies on these chemically synthesized CDs raised questions about the nature of the resulting products. Their strong fluorescence can arise due to the presence of molecular organic fluorophores, not necessary CDs, as was assumed in the earlier publications. In this review, we consider fundamental characteristics of CDs and discuss several issues that currently prevent a better understanding of their structure-property correlation. Analysis of recent related studies identifying the presence of organic fluorophores in CDs with an emphasis on the optical properties of the synthesis products shows that their emission characteristics may be a complex interplay of stand-alone molecular fluorophores and their aggregates, possibly embedded in an amorphous carbon/polymer network. The review concludes with an outlook towards the challenges in the field of the bottom-up synthesized CDs, and their proper identification within the variety of the organic side-products eventually formed during the synthesis. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available