4.1 Article

Ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) induces oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory response via up-regulating the expression of CYP1A1/1B1 in human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.12.005

Keywords

PM2.5; Human bronchial epithelial cells; CYP1A1/1B1; Oxidative stress; Pro-inflammatory response

Funding

  1. Collaborative research project of Southeast University-Nanjing Medical University [2242017K3DN16]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0211600, 2017YFC0211605]
  3. Undergraduates Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship of Jiangsu Province [201510312001Z]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Public Health and Preventive Medicine)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the mechanism responsible for the oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory response triggered by PM2.5 collected from Nanjing of China. Two human bronchial epithelia cell lines (HBE and BEAS-2B) were used. Human gene expression profile microarray was performed to investigate the alteration of gene expression in PM2.5-treated HBE cells. The results of ROS assay and ELISA indicated that PM2.5 (150 mu g/ml) increased the level of cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and promoted the release of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in HBE cells. CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 were the top two up-regulated genes by PM2.5 (150 mu g/ml, 48 h of exposure) in HBE cells. Co-knockdown of CYP1A1/1B1 by siRNA substantially inhibited PM2.5-induced ROS generation, IL-6/IL-8 secretion and STAT3/P-STAT3 expression. Similarly, the knockdown of STAT3 also effectively inhibited PM2.5-induced rise in ROS level and IL-6/IL-8 secretion. In summary, PM2.5 mediated oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory response via up-regulating the expression of CYP1A1/1B1 in two human bronchial epithelial cell lines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available