4.5 Article

Docosahexaenoic acid promotes micron scale liquid-ordered domains. A comparison study of docosahexaenoic versus oleic acid containing phosphatidylcholine in raft-like mixtures

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
Volume 1848, Issue 6, Pages 1424-1435

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.02.027

Keywords

Docosahexaenoic acid; Raft; Liquid-ordered phase; Oleic acid; PUFA

Funding

  1. Bulgarian Fund [DTK02/5/2009, B02/23/2014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The understanding of the functional role of the lipid diversity in biological membranes is a major challenge. Lipid models have been developed to address this issue by using lipid mixtures generating liquid-ordered (L-o)/liquid-disordered (L-d) immiscibility. The present study examined mixtures comprising Egg sphingomyelin (SM), cholesterol (chol) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) either containing docosahexaenoic (PDPC) or oleic acid (POPC). The mixtures were examined in terms of their capability to induce phase separation at the micron- and nano-scales. Fluorescence microscopy, electron spin resonance (ESR), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and calorimetty methods were used to analyze the lateral organization of the mixtures. Fluorescence microscopy of giant vesicles could show that the temperature of the micron-scale L-o/L-d miscibility is higher for PDPC than for POPC ternary mixtures. At 37 degrees C, no micron-scale L-o/L-d phase separation could be identified in the POPC containing mixtures while it was evident for PDPC. In contrast, a phase separation was distinguished for both PC mixtures by ESR and XRD, indicative that PDPC and POPC mixtures differed in micron vs nano domain organization. Compared to POPC, the higher line tension of the L-o domains observed in PDPC mixtures is assumed to result from the higher difference in L-o/L-d order parameter rather than hydrophobic mismatch. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available