4.7 Article

The clustering of the SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample: a tomographic measurement of cosmic structure growth and expansion rate based on optimal redshift weights

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 482, Issue 3, Pages 3497-3513

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2845

Keywords

cosmological parameters; dark energy; distance scale; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [646702]
  2. NSFC [11720101004, 11673025, 11711530207]
  3. National Key Basic Research and Development Programe of China [2018YFA0404503]
  4. Royal Society Newton Advanced Fellowship
  5. Nebula Talents Program - National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  6. Young Researcher Grant - National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  7. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MoEST) [2017077508]
  8. Sejong University
  9. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  10. National Science Foundation
  11. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  12. University of Arizona
  13. Brazilian Participation Group
  14. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  15. Carnegie Mellon University
  16. University of Florida
  17. French Participation Group
  18. German Participation Group
  19. Harvard University
  20. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  21. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  22. Johns Hopkins University
  23. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  24. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  25. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  26. New Mexico State University
  27. New York University
  28. Ohio State University
  29. Pennsylvania State University
  30. University of Portsmouth
  31. Princeton University
  32. Spanish Participation Group
  33. University of Tokyo
  34. University of Utah
  35. Vanderbilt University
  36. University of Virginia
  37. University of Washington
  38. Yale University
  39. Colorado University, Boulder
  40. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Participation Group
  41. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe Max-Planck-Institut fuer Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  42. Max-Planck-Institut fuer Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  43. Max-Planck-Institut fuer Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  44. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  45. Penn State University
  46. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  47. United Kingdom Participation Group
  48. University of Wisconsin
  49. ICG
  50. SEP-Net
  51. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  52. STFC [ST/N000668/1, ST/M002853/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We develop a new method, which is based on the optimal redshift weighting scheme, to extract the maximal tomographic information of baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) and redshift space distortions (RSD) from the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) Data Release 14 quasar (DR14Q) survey. We validate our method using the Extended Zel'dovich mocks, and apply our pipeline to the eBOSS DR14Q sample in the redshift range of 0.8 < z < 2.2. We report a joint measurement of f sigma(8) and two-dimensional BAO parameters D-A and H at four effective redshifts of z(eff) = 0.98, 1.23, 1.52, and 1.94, and provide the full data covariance matrix. Using our measurement combined with BOSS DR12, Main Galaxy Sample (MGS), and 6 degree Field Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) BAO measurements, we find that the existence of dark energy is supported by observations at a 7.4 sigma significance level. Combining our measurement with BOSS DR12 and Planck observations, we constrain the gravitational growth index to be gamma = 0.580 +/- 0.082, which is fully consistent with the prediction of general relativity. This paper is part of a set that analyses the eBOSS DR14 quasar sample.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available