4.6 Article

TANGO-Inspired Design of Anti-Amyloid Cyclic Peptides

Journal

ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 1264-1274

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00150

Keywords

beta-Amyloid; transthyretin; cyclic peptide; Alzheimer's disease; peptide drugs; amyloid fibrils

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01AG033493]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

beta-Amyloid peptide (A beta) self-associates into oligomers and fibrils, in a process that is believed to directly lead to neuronal death in Alzheimer's disease. Compounds that bind to AA and inhibit fibrillogenesis and neurotoxicity, are of interest as an anti-Alzheimer therapeutic strategy. Peptides are particularly attractive for this purpose, because they have advantages over small molecules in their ability to disrupt protein protein interactions, yet they are amenable to tuning of their properties through chemical means, unlike antibodies. Self complementation and peptide library screening are two strategies that have been employed in the search for peptides that bind to A beta. We have taken a different approach, by designing A beta-binding peptides using transthyretin (TTR) as a template. Previously, we demonstrated that a cyclic peptide, with sequence derived from the known A beta-binding site on TTR, suppressed A beta aggregation into fibrils and protected neurons against A beta toxicity. Here, we searched for cyclic peptides with improved efficacy, by employing the algorithm TANGO, designed originally to identify amyloidogenic sequences in proteins. By using TANGO as a guide to predict the effect of sequence modifications on conformation and aggregation, we synthesized a significantly improved cyclic peptide. We demonstrate that the peptide, in binding to A beta, redirects A beta toward protease-sensitive, nonfibrillar aggregates. Cyclic peptides designed using this strategy have attractive solubility, specificity, and stability characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available