4.6 Article

Mapping the O-glycoproteome using site-specific extraction of O-linked glycopeptides (EXoO)

Journal

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20188486

Keywords

glycoproteomics; glycosylation; O-GalNAc; O-linked; site-specific

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R21AI122382]
  2. National Cancer Institute, the Early Detection Research Network (EDRN) [U01CA152813]
  3. National Cancer Institute, Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) [U24CA210985]
  4. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Programs of Excellence in Glycosciences (PEG) [P01HL107153]
  5. amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research on Bringing Bioengineers to Cure HIV [amfAR 109551-61-RGRL]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synopsis Protein glycosylation is one of the most abundant post-translational modifications. However, detailed analysis of O-linked glycosylation, a major type of protein glycosylation, has been severely impeded by the scarcity of suitable methodologies. Here, a chemoenzymatic method is introduced for the site-specific extraction of O-linked glycopeptides (EXoO), which enabled the mapping of over 3,000 O-linked glycosylation sites and definition of their glycans on over 1,000 proteins in human kidney tissues, T cells, and serum. This large-scale localization of O-linked glycosylation sites demonstrated that EXoO is an effective method for defining the site-specific O-linked glycoproteome in different types of sample. Detailed structural analysis of the sites identified revealed conserved motifs and topological orientations facing extracellular space, the cell surface, the lumen of the Golgi, and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). EXoO was also able to reveal significant differences in the O-linked glycoproteome of tumor and normal kidney tissues pointing to its broader use in clinical diagnostics and therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available