4.6 Review

Why Nature Chose Selenium

Journal

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 821-841

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00031

Keywords

Selenocysteine; Selenouracil; Selenoxide elimination; Selenenic acid; Seleninic acid; Selenonic acid; Selenoxide; Selenone; Selanyl radical; Oxidative inactivation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors were asked by the Editors of ACS Chemical Biology to write an article titled Why Nature Chose Selenium for the occasion of the upcoming bicentennial of the discovery of selenium by the Swedish chemist Jons Jacob Berzelius in 1817 and styled after the famous work of Frank Westheimer on the biological chemistry of phosphate [Westheimer, F. H. (1987) Why Nature Chose Phosphates, Science 23S, 1173-1178]. This work gives a history of the important discoveries of the biological processes that selenium participates in, and a point-by-point comparison of the chemistry of selenium with the atom it replaces in biology, sulfur. This analysis shows that redox chemistry is the largest chemical difference between the two chalcogens. This difference is very large for both one-electron and two-electron redox reactions. Much of this difference is due to the inability of selenium to form pi bonds of all types. The outer valence electrons of selenium are also more loosely held than those of sulfur. As a result, selenium is a better nucleophile and will react with reactive oxygen species faster than sulfur, but the resulting lack of pi-bond character in the Se-O bond means that the Se-oxide can be much more readily reduced in comparison to S-oxides. The combination of these properties means that replacement of sulfur with selenium in nature results in a selenium-containing biomolecule that resists permanent oxidation. Multiple examples of this gain of function behavior from the literature are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available