4.7 Article

Human Milk Oligosaccharides Increase Mucin Expression in Experimental Necrotizing Enterocolitis

Journal

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201800658

Keywords

goblet cells; human milk oligosaccharides; intestinal epithelial barrier; mucus; necrotizing enterocolitis

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CIHR MOP-89894, IOP-92890]
  2. Vanier Graduate Student Award from the CIHR
  3. Canada Research Chair in Gastrointestinal Disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scope Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a leading cause of morbidity and death in preterm infants, occurring more often in formula-fed than breastfed infants. Studies in both rats and humans show that human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) lower the incidence of NEC, but the mechanism underlying such protection is currently unclear. Methods and Results By extracting HMOs from pooled human breastmilk, the impact of HMOs on the intestinal mucin levels in a murine model of NEC are investigated. To confirm the results, the findings are validated by exposing human intestinal epithelial cells and intestinal organoids to HMOs and evaluated for mucin expression. HMO-gavage to pups increases Muc2 levels and decreases intestinal permeability to macromolecular dextran. HMO-treated cells have increased Muc2 expression, decreased bacterial attachment and dextran permeability during challenge by enteric pathogens. To identify the mediators involved in HMO induction of mucins, it is demonstrated that HMOs directly induce the expression of chaperone proteins including protein disulfide isomerase (PDI). Suppression of PDI activity removes the protective effects of HMOs on barrier function in vitro as well as NEC protection in vivo. Conclusions Taken together, the results provide insights to the possible mechanisms by which HMOs protect the neonatal intestine through upregulation of mucins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available