4.8 Article

Structural Patching Fosters Divergence of Mitochondrial Ribosomes

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 207-219

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msy221

Keywords

RNA evolution; RNA structure; ribosome; mitochondria; eukaryotes

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [NT_ 2015: 04107]
  2. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research [FFL15: 0325]
  3. Ragnar Soderberg Foundation [M44/16]
  4. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF) [FFL15-0325] Funding Source: Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitochondrial ribosomes (mitoribosomes) are essential components of all mitochondria that synthesize proteins encoded by the mitochondrial genome. Unlike other ribosomes, mitoribosomes are highly variable across species. The basis for this diversity is not known. Here, we examine the composition and evolutionary history of mitoribosomes across the phylogenetic tree by combining three-dimensional structural information with a comparative analysis of the secondary structures of mitochondrial rRNAs (mt-rRNAs) and available proteomic data. We generate a map of the acquisition of structural variation and reconstruct the fundamental stages that shaped the evolution of the mitoribosomal large subunit and led to this diversity. Our analysis suggests a critical role for ablation and expansion of rapidly evolving mt-rRNA. These changes cause structural instabilities that are patched by the acquisition of pre-existing compensatory elements, thus providing opportunities for rapid evolution. This mechanism underlies the incorporation of mt-tRNA into the central protuberance of the mammalian mitoribosome, and the altered path of the polypeptide exit tunnel of the yeast mitoribosome. We propose that since the toolkits of elements utilized for structural patching differ between mitochondria of different species, it fosters the growing divergence of mitoribosomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available