4.8 Article

Palladium Nanoparticle Incorporated Porous Activated Carbon: Electrochemical Detection of Toxic Metal Ions

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 1319-1326

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b10050

Keywords

palladium nanoparticles; fruit peels; porous activated carbon; toxic metal ions; cyclic voltammetry; sensors

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan [NSC 104-2113-M-001-019, NSC 101-2113-M-027-001-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A facile method has been developed for fabricating selective and sensitive electrochemical sensors for the detection of toxic metal ions, which invokes incorporation of palladium nanoparticles (Pd NPs) on porous activated carbons (PACs). The PACs, which were derived from waste biomass feedstock (fruit peels), possess desirable textural properties and porosities favorable for dispersion of Pd NPs (ca. 3-4 nm) on the graphitic PAC substrate. The Pd/PAC composite materials so fabricated were characterized by a variety of different techniques, such as X-ray diffraction, field-emission transmission electron microscopy, gas physisorption/chemisorption, thermogravimetric analysis, and Raman, Fourier-transform infrared, and X-ray photon spectroscopies. The Pd/PAC-modified glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs) were exploited as electrochemical sensors for the detection of toxic heavy metal ions, viz., Cd2+ Pb2+, Cu-2+,Cu- and Hg2+, which showed superior performances for both individual as well as simultaneous detections. For simultaneous detection of Cd2+, Pb2+, Cu2+ and Hg2+ a linear response in the ion concentration range of 0.5-5.5, 0.5-8.9, 0.5-5.0, and 0.24-7.5 mu M, with sensitivity of 66.7, 53.8, 41.1, and 50.3 mu A mu M-1 cm(-2,) and detection limit of 41, 50, 66, and 54 nM, respectively, was observed. Moreover, the Pd/PAC-modified GCEs also show perspective applications in detection of metal ions in real samples, as illustrated in this study for a milk sample.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available