4.7 Review

Topoisomerase 1B poisons: Over a half-century of drug leads, clinical candidates, and serendipitous discoveries

Journal

MEDICINAL RESEARCH REVIEWS
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 1294-1337

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/med.21546

Keywords

alkaloids; camptothecin; cancer; drug discovery; indenoisoquinolines; natural products; semisynthetic derivatives; Topoisomerase

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01 CA89566]
  2. Purdue University
  3. Purdue Research Foundation [203202]
  4. Graduate School, Purdue University
  5. Purdue University, College of Pharmacy
  6. Lynn Fellowship
  7. McKeehan Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Topoisomerases are DNA processing enzymes that relieve supercoiling (torsional strain) in DNA, are necessary for normal cellular division, and act by nicking (and then religating) DNA strands. Type 1B topoisomerase (Top1) is overexpressed in certain tumors, and the enzyme has been extensively investigated as a target for cancer chemotherapy. Various chemical agents can act as poisons of the enzyme's religation step, leading to Top1-DNA lesions, DNA breakage, and eventual cellular death. In this review, agents that poison Top1 (and have thus been investigated for their anticancer properties) are surveyed, including natural products (such as camptothecins and indolocarbazoles), semisynthetic camptothecin and luotonin derivatives, and synthetic compounds (such as benzonaphthyridines, aromathecins, and indenoisoquinolines), as well as targeted therapies and conjugates. Top1 has also been investigated as a therapeutic target in certain viral and parasitic infections, as well as autoimmune, inflammatory, and neurological disorders, and a summary of literature describing alternative indications is also provided. This review should provide both a reference for the medicinal chemist and potentially offer clues to aid in the development of new Top1 poisons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available