4.4 Article

Splenic irradiation before allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

Journal

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-019-1245-5

Keywords

Myelofibrosis; Splenomegaly; Splenectomy; Splenic irradiation; Allogeneic stem cell transplantation; Outcome

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Splenectomy before allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) remains a matter of debate, and conflicting results have been reported to date. The procedure seems to fasten post-transplant hematological recovery, but it does not have an impact on survival. The role of pre-transplant splenic irradiation (SI) is much more difficult to evaluate. Forty-four patients (25 males and 19 females) with MF at median age of 49years at diagnosis (range 14-67) underwent ASCT. The post-transplant outcome was compared between irradiated and non-irradiated patients. Eleven patients received irradiation before transplantation. Median dose of radiation was 1000cGy (range 600-2400). There was no difference in median time to engraftment between patients with and without previous radiotherapy. Acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) occurred in 47% and 36% of patients, respectively. There was no difference in GVHD incidence between groups. Eight patients relapsed/progressed in irradiated group versus 17 in non-irradiated (70% vs. 51%; p=0.3). Transformation to acute myeloid leukemia was observed in 3 patients: 2 in irradiated and 1 in non-irradiated group. In total, 22 patients died with no statistical difference in death rate between irradiated and non-irradiated subjects. The probability of overall survival after transplant for the entire cohort at 2years was 54% (72% for irradiated and 48% for non-irradiated patients; p=0.25). Splenic irradiation prior to ASCT for myelofibrosis has not beneficial effect on post-transplant outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available