4.4 Article

Variation in Laboratory Test Naming Conventions in EHRs Within and Between Hospitals A Nationwide Longitudinal Study

Journal

MEDICAL CARE
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages e22-e27

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000996

Keywords

electronic health records; EHR; laboratory results; administrative data

Funding

  1. VA Health Services Research & Development IIR [109, 16-024]
  2. Veterans Health Administration's Office of Reporting, Analytics, Performance, Improvement and Deployment (RAPID)
  3. National Institutes of Health [K08 GM115859]
  4. [K12 HL138039]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Electronic health records provide clinically rich data for research and quality improvement work. However, the data are often unstructured text, may be inconsistently recorded and extracted into centralized databases, making them difficult to use for research. Objectives: We sought to quantify the variation in how key laboratory measures are recorded in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) across hospitals and over time. We included 6 laboratory tests commonly drawn within the first 24 hours of hospital admission (albumin, bilirubin, creatinine, hemoglobin, sodium, white blood cell count) from fiscal years 2005-2015. Results: We assessed laboratory test capture for 5,454,411 acute hospital admissions at 121 sites across the VA. The mapping of standardized laboratory nomenclature (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes, LOINCs) to test results in CDW varied within hospital by laboratory test. The relationship between LOINCs and laboratory test names improved over time; by FY2015, 109 (95.6%) hospitals had > 90% of the 6 laboratory tests mapped to an appropriate LOINC. All fields used to classify test results are provided in an Appendix (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links. lww. com/MLR/B635). Conclusions: The use of electronic health record data for research requires assessing data consistency and quality. Using laboratory test results requires the use of both unstructured text fields and the identification of appropriate LOINCs. When using data from multiple facilities, the results should be carefully examined by facility and over time to maximize the capture of data fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available