4.7 Article

Investigation on ratcheting-fatigue behavior and damage mechanism of GH4169 at 650 °C

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.11.092

Keywords

Low cycle fatigue; Ratcheting fatigue; Nickel-based superalloy; Microscopic analysis; Failure mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775355]
  2. Key Laboratory of Vibration and Control of Aero-Propulsion System Ministry of Education, Northeastern University [VCAME201701]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China [NCET-13-0400]
  4. Tianjin University Independent Innovation Foundation [2013E3-0003]
  5. CARE Lab at Tianjin university

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combined microscopy and morphology were employed to investigate the effect of ratcheting-fatigue characteristic of GH4169 superalloy. All tests were implemented on a closed-loop servo hydraulic testing machine at 650 degrees C. The cyclic deformation behaviors and damage mechanisms of nickel-based superalloy GH4169 were investigated by means of a series of symmetric and asymmetric stress-controlled tests under various stress amplitudes and mean stress levels at 650 T. The results exhibit a distinct reduction in fatigue life with the increasing of mean stress and stress amplitude. A continuous cyclic softening until final failure is observed for all the tests. Moreover, the ratcheting effect begins to operate exclusively beyond the threshold value corresponding to a stress amplitude of 600 MPa joint with a tensile mean stress of 50 MPa. A transformation in terms of cracks propagation mode from transgranular to transgranular-intergranular mixed mode has been illustrated. Meanwhile, a higher stress amplitude enhances a more intense slip trace. In addition to the damage caused by high temperature oxidation, the interaction between slip band and grain boundary is the underlying dominant factor on intergranular damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available