4.3 Article

Improvement of Sea Surface Height Measurements of HY-2A Satellite Altimeter Using Jason-2

Journal

MARINE GEODESY
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages 632-648

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2018.1529643

Keywords

crossover analysis; HY-2A satellite altimeter; measurement accuracy; sea surface height; the orbit error correction

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC1401800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41576176]
  3. Dragon 4 Project [32292]
  4. National Programme on Global Change and Air-Sea Interaction [GASI-02-PAC-YGST2-04, GASI-02-SCS-YGST2-04, GASI-02-IND-YGST2-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HY-2A, which was launched on 16 August 2011, is the Chinese first microwave ocean dynamics environment satellite. Analyses of HY-2A daily sea-level anomaly data and HY-2A-Jason-2 (H-J) dual crossover sea-level anomaly differences show that HY-2A has measurement differences that mainly refer to an orbit error. H-J crossover differences and HY-2A-HY-2A (H-H) crossover differences give an estimate of the HY-2A orbit error. Smoothing cubic-spline functions are then used to obtain a continuous estimation of the HY-2A orbit error over time. On the basis of the simultaneous global minimization of H-J dual crossover differences and H-H crossover differences, the HY-2A observation error is efficiently reduced and height measurement data that are more precise are obtained. Specifically, the range bias/trend of the HY-2A altimeter is removed effectively and the root mean square of H-J crossover sea-level anomaly differences decrease from above 60 cm to 5.64 cm, and the standard deviation of H-J crossover differences decreases from 6.68 to 5.64 cm. Furthermore, the rms and standard deviations of H-H crossover differences both decrease from 7.46 to 6.55 cm. The results show that HY-2A after correction has a measurement accuracy and precision that are comparable to those of Jason-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available