4.2 Article

Quantitative CT and 19F-MRI tracking of perfluorinated encapsulated mesenchymal stem cells to assess graft immunorejection

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-018-0728-2

Keywords

Quantitative tracking; F-19-MRI; Encapsulated stem cells; Peripheral artery disease; Immunorejection

Funding

  1. Siemens AG
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [NIH R33-HL089029]
  3. Maryland Stem Cell Research Foundation [2008-MDSCRFII-0399]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesPeripheral artery disease (PAD) affects 12-14% of the world population, and many are not eligible for conventional treatment. For these patients, microencapsulated stem cells (SCs) offer a novel means to transplant mismatched therapeutic SCs to prevent graft immunorejection. Using c-arm CT and F-19-MRI for serial evaluation of dual X-ray/MR-visible SC microcapsules (XMRCaps) in a non-immunosuppressed rabbit PAD model, we explore quantitative evaluation of capsule integrity as a surrogate of transplanted cell fate.Materials and methodsXMRCaps were produced by impregnating 12% perfluorooctylbromine (PFOB) with rabbit or human SCs (AlloSC and XenoSC, respectively). Volume and F-19 concentration measurements of XMRCaps were assessed both in phantoms and in vivo, at days 1, 8 and 15 after intramuscular administration in rabbits (n=10), by 3D segmenting the injection sites and referencing to standards with known concentrations.ResultsXMRCap volumes and concentrations showed good agreement between CT and MRI both in vitro and in vivo in XenoSC rabbits. Injected capsules showed small variations over time and were similar between AlloSC and XenoSC rabbits. Histological staining revealed high cell viability and intact capsules 2weeks after administration.ConclusionsQuantitative and non-invasive tracking XMRCaps using CT and F-19-MRI may be useful to assess graft immunorejection after SC transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available