Journal
LYMPHATIC RESEARCH AND BIOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 329-333Publisher
MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0014
Keywords
lymphedema staging; lymphedema surgery; lymphedema
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Multiple staging systems for classifying the severity of lymphedema exist. The International Society of Lymphology (ISL) stage is considered standard for clinical reporting, but the relationship between clinical and functional/imaging stage remains poorly defined. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the prospectively collected data of all patients who underwent physiologic lymphedema surgery for a 3-year period by the senior author. Patients who underwent preoperative clinical staging with limb volume calculations and intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) staging were included. Correlations were examined between ISL stage, ICG stage, and preoperative volume difference. Results: A total of 212 patients met inclusion criteria. ISL stage and preoperative volume difference had a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.579 [p < 0.001, 95% confidence intervals, CIs (0.479-0.664)]; ICG stage and preoperative volume difference had a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.338 [p < 0.001, 95% CIs (0.204-0.460)]; and ISL stage and ICG stage had a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.254 [p < 0.001, 95% CIs (0.114-0.383)]. Conclusion: Clinical ISL stage does not correlate well with ICG stage in patients undergoing physiologic lymphedema surgery.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available