4.7 Article

Setting conservation priorities in cities: approaches, targets and planning units adapted to wetland biodiversity and ecosystem services

Journal

LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 11, Pages 1975-1995

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-018-0707-z

Keywords

Demand; Hotspots; Marxan; Multicriteria decision analysis; Systematic conservation planning; Urban planning

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [RGPIN-2014-05663]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ContextProtecting wetlands in cities is challenging. A cost-effective spatial prioritization approach taking into account stakeholder motivations is needed to identify wetlands of conservation interest.ObjectivesThis study aims to optimize the efficiency of a systematic conservation planning (SCP) approach to protect nine urban wetland ecosystem services (ES) and biodiversity.MethodsFirst, we mapped ES supply and demand to capture their spatial variation as they occur at the wetland scale. Secondly, using wetland property value as cost data, we compared the efficiency of SCP to two multicriteria scoring approaches. Thirdly, we compared SCP alternatives by changing the planning unit scale and conservation objectives (i.e. emphasizing ES demand and focusing on the most important ES).ResultsThe total cost of the scoring approach networks was minimally 13 times higher, when compared to the SCP approaches. Consequently, the scoring approaches were at least five times less efficient than SCP per unit of network area ($/m(2)). Decreasing the size of planning units resulted in further cost reduction, with networks that were up to 92% less costly. We also highlighted that beneficiary demand fulfillment in networks could be optimized without a loss in efficiency. Finally, SCP secured nine ES for the same expenditure as that required to protect four public safety related ES. However, planning solely for these four important ES failed to represent those of other ES.ConclusionsOur results may provide a tool to better inform land use decision planning in order to mitigate the impacts of urban growth on ES.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available