4.7 Review

Tuberculosis susceptibility and protection in children

Journal

LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages E96-E108

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30157-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Medical Research Council (MRC)
  2. UK Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID Concordat agreement
  3. European Union [MR/K023446/1]
  4. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR)
  5. Academy of Medical Sciences
  6. Fulbright scholarship
  7. MRC programme [MR/K011944/1]
  8. MRC-GCRF Foundation [MR/P024270/1]
  9. NIHR senior fellowship [SRF-2009-02-07]
  10. MRC [MC_UU_00026/2, MC_UP_A900_1122, MC_EX_MR/K011944/1, MR/K023446/1, MR/R007942/1, MC_EX_MR/P024270/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Children represent both a clinically important population susceptible to tuberculosis and a key group in whom to study intrinsic and vaccine-induced mechanisms of protection. After exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, children aged under 5 years are at high risk of progressing first to tuberculosis infection, then to tuberculosis disease and possibly disseminated forms of tuberculosis, with accompanying high risks of morbidity and mortality. Children aged 5-10 years are somewhat protected, until risk increases again in adolescence. Furthermore, neonatal BCG programmes show the clearest proven benefit of vaccination against tuberculosis. Case-control comparisons from key cohorts, which recruited more than 15 000 children and adolescents in total, have identified that the ratio of monocytes to lymphocytes, activated CD4 T cell count, and a blood RNA signature could be correlates of risk for developing tuberculosis. Further studies of protected and susceptible populations are necessary to guide development of novel tuberculosis vaccines that could facilitate the achievement of WHO's goal to eliminate deaths from tuberculosis in childhood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available