4.7 Article

Effect of temperature and magnesia on phase transformation kinetics in stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric cordierite ceramics prepared from kaolinite precursors

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 137, Issue 1, Pages 11-23

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-018-7923-2

Keywords

Kaolinite; Magnesia; Cordierite; Solid-state reaction; Phase transformation kinetics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of temperature and magnesia content on the formation of phases and their transformation kinetics in stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric cordierite ceramics prepared from Algerian kaolinite precursors was investigated. High-temperature X-ray diffraction was used to study the formation of phases and their transformations. Non-isothermal differential thermal analysis was used to determine kinetic parameters for the formation of and cordierite. Activation energies were calculated by Kissinger, Boswell, and Ozawa equations. The Augis-Bennett and Matusita equations were used to calculate the mode of crystallization (n) and dimension of growth (m) parameters, respectively. The synthesized materials showed similar phase transformations, which finally led to the formation of cordierite in stoichiometric kaolinite-magnesia mixture, and cordierite along with other phases in kaolinite-magnesia mixture containing excess magnesia. The activation energy for the formation of cordierite was higher than that of cordierite. Energies of formation of and cordierite phases in the non-stoichiometric samples were higher than those in the stoichiometric sample. The activation energy was less sensitive to the calculation method; however, it changed significantly with MgO content. Activation energies between 573 and 964kJmol(-1) were obtained. Magnesia changed the crystallization mode and crystal growth dimension. The kinetic parameters n and m, for the formation of or cordierite, had values between 2 and 3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available