4.7 Article

Survival and internalization of Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 sprayed onto different cabbage cultivars during cultivation in growth chambers

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 99, Issue 7, Pages 3530-3537

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9573

Keywords

pre-harvest; internalization; survival; phenols; antioxidant capacity; pathogen

Funding

  1. Georgia Agricultural Commodity Commission for Vegetables [047375-01, FP00003748]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDCabbage may become contaminated with enteric pathogens during cultivation. Using multiple cabbage cultivars at two maturity stages (small plants or plants with small heads) in growth chamber studies, the fate (internalization or surface survival) of Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 (0157) were examined in conjunction with any potential relationships to the plant's antimicrobial content. RESULTSInternalized Salmonella was detected in cabbage within 24 h with prevalence ranging from 62% (16 of 26) for the Super Red 80' cultivar to 92% (24 of 26) for the Red Dynasty' cultivar. Surface survival of pathogens on small cabbage plants over nine days was significantly affected by cultivar with both pathogens surviving the most on the Farao' cultivar and Salmonella and O157 surviving the least on the Super Red 80' and Capture' cultivars, respectively (P < 0.05). Survival of O157 was slightly higher on cabbage heads for O157 than small plants suggesting that the maturity stage may affect this pathogen's fate. An inverse relationship existed between antimicrobial levels and the pathogen's surface survival on cabbage heads (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONSThe fate of pathogens varied with the cabbage cultivar in growth chamber studies highlighting the potential to explore cultivar in field studies to reduce the risk of microbiological contamination in this crop. (c) 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available