4.4 Article

Race, Poverty, and Initial Implementation of Precision Medicine for Lung Cancer

Journal

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 431-434

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy202

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. California Department of Public Health [103885]
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI)'s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program [HHSN261201000140C, HHSN261201000035C, HHSN261201000034C]
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC's) National Program of Cancer Registries [U58DP003862-01]
  4. K05 grant from the NCI [K05CA169384]
  5. R01 grant from the NCI [R01CA114465]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data are limited regarding whether the availability of biomarker-directed therapy for lung cancer exacerbates racial and socioeconomic disparities. Patients diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma from 2008 to 2013 were identified using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Medicare. The primary outcome was a Medicare claim for molecular testing within 60 days of diagnosis, analyzed using multivariable logistic regression; the secondary outcome was overall survival, analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Of 5556 patients, 1437 (25.9%) had molecular testing. Testing rates were 14.1% among black, 26.2% among white, and 32.8% among patients of Asian/other descent (adjusted P < .001); 20.6% among patients with Medicaid eligibility vs 28.4% among those without (adjusted P = .01); and 19.9% among patients in the highest census tract-level poverty rate quintile vs 30.7% among patients in the lowest quintile (for all quintiles, adjusted P = .18). Median survival from 60 days was 8.2 months among patients with molecular testing within 60 days of diagnosis and 6.1 months among those without (hazard ratio = 0.92, 95% confidence interval = 0.86 to 0.99; adjusted P = .02). Equitable precision medicine requires concerted implementation efforts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available