4.6 Article

Relevance of Polypharmacy for Clinical Outcome in Patients Receiving Vitamin K Antagonists

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages 463-470

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15712

Keywords

anticoagulant drugs; hemorrhage; multimorbidity; phenprocoumon; polypharmacy

Funding

  1. state initiative health economy of the Ministry of Health, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany [AZ.623-1]
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany [BMBF 10E01003]
  3. Centre for Translational Vascular Biology (CTVB) of the University Medical Center Mainz
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH Co. KG
  5. Bayer Vital GmbH
  6. Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH
  7. Sanofi-Aventis Germany GmbH
  8. IMO Institute GmbH
  9. Portavita BV
  10. German Heart Foundation
  11. state initiative health economy of the Ministry of Economics, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany [AZ.623-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDAlthough polypharmacy is associated with a negative clinical outcome in various settings and commonly observed in patients receiving oral anticoagulation therapy, evidence on the relevance for the clinical outcome of anticoagulated patients is currently limited. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of polypharmacy on the clinical outcomes among patients taking phenprocoumon. DESIGNProspective cohort study. SETTINGRegular medical care. PARTICIPANTSInformation on 2011 individuals receiving vitamin K antagonists was available for analysis from the prospective multicenter thrombEVAL study. MEASUREMENTSData were obtained from clinical visits, computer-assisted interviews, and laboratory measurements. Information on clinical outcome was obtained during a 3-year follow-up period and subsequently validated via medical records. RESULTSThe prevalence of polypharmacy (five drugs or more) was 84.1% (n = 1691). Quality of anticoagulation therapy assessed by time in therapeutic range was lower in individuals on five to eight drugs and nine drugs or more (70.7% and 64.7%, respectively) compared with subjects without polypharmacy (73.4%). In addition, a significantly higher variability of international normalized ratio measurements was found in the presence of polypharmacy. The cumulative incidence of bleeding, hospitalization, and all-cause mortality, but not for thromboembolic events, increased across groups of medication. In adjusted Cox regression analysis, polypharmacy is an independent risk factor for bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] (9 drugs vs 1-4 drugs) = 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04-2.52; p = .033); hospitalization (HR (9 drugs vs 1-4 drugs) = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.26-2.03; p < .001; and all-cause mortality (HR (9 drugs vs 1-4 drugs) = 2.16; 95% CI = 1.43-3.27; p < .001) in a dose-dependent relationship. Per additional drug, bleeding risk was increased by 4%. CONCLUSIONSPolypharmacy influences the quality of anticoagulation therapy and translates into an elevated risk of adverse events in anticoagulated patients. This suggests that additional medication intake in such patients should be critically reviewed by physicians, and it highlights the importance of initiating investigations aimed at reducing multiple medication intake. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:463-470, 2019.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available