Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 72, Issue 16, Pages 1972-1980Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.074
Keywords
cardiogenic shock; care pathway; shock center
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Despite advances over the past decade, the incidence of cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction has increased, with an unchanged mortality near 50%. Recent trials have not clarified the best strategies in treatment. While dedicated cardiac shock centers are being established, there are no standardized agreements on the utilization of mechanical circulatory support and the timeliness of percutaneous coronary intervention strategies. In some centers and prospective registries, outcomes after placement of advanced mechanical circulatory support prior to reperfusion therapy with percutaneous coronary intervention have been encouraging with improved survival. Here, we suggest systems of care with a treatment pathway for patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. (C) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available